| 2011 NCAA College Football Discussion thread | |
|
+16lemonhead75 Jake_Ace Jordan Robson Buckeye24 Caleb Paul Doc Matt Patterson KAuto26 TM93 Cory Spencer bakes991 lonewolf2864 TheShermanator Lambert AuzGrams Matt_Emerson29 20 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
bakes991 Admin
Number of posts : 4561 Location : Losing my mind on the internet. Registration date : 2008-12-11
| Subject: Re: 2011 NCAA College Football Discussion thread Sun Jan 01, 2012 9:01 am | |
| Good win Utah! Close game, which is what I expected and it was exciting to follow, even though GT lost, it was a well fought game by both sides.
8-5 was a better season that I was expecting! | |
|
| |
AuzGrams Moderator
Number of posts : 1514 Age : 30 Location : Heber City, UT Registration date : 2010-05-15
| Subject: Re: 2011 NCAA College Football Discussion thread Sun Jan 01, 2012 9:06 am | |
| Down 24-10 with a horrible QB and we comeback and win, I'll take this, the PAC-12 needed someone to win them a bowl game. | |
|
| |
AuzGrams Moderator
Number of posts : 1514 Age : 30 Location : Heber City, UT Registration date : 2010-05-15
| Subject: Re: 2011 NCAA College Football Discussion thread Sun Jan 01, 2012 9:12 am | |
| They should have reviewed that TD, it was a TD, but now people will be crying wolf saying "THEY DIDN't SCORE, THEY DIDN'T WIN." | |
|
| |
Caleb Paul Admin
Number of posts : 4388 Age : 30 Location : Colorado Registration date : 2008-12-11
| Subject: Re: 2011 NCAA College Football Discussion thread Sun Jan 01, 2012 9:38 am | |
| That was pretty close on the couple of replays they showed, but for the most part it looked like they were in. Pretty good game. The Liberty Bowl right now is damn close at 24-21 with Cincinnati leading. | |
|
| |
AuzGrams Moderator
Number of posts : 1514 Age : 30 Location : Heber City, UT Registration date : 2010-05-15
| Subject: Re: 2011 NCAA College Football Discussion thread Sun Jan 01, 2012 3:45 pm | |
| - bakes991 wrote:
- Good win Utah! Close game, which is what I expected and it was exciting to follow, even though GT lost, it was a well fought game by both sides.
8-5 was a better season that I was expecting! Let's be honest, GT needs to get rid of Paul Johnson, they seem like they have a solid program, but that option offense isn't fooling the top of the ACC like VT. | |
|
| |
bakes991 Admin
Number of posts : 4561 Location : Losing my mind on the internet. Registration date : 2008-12-11
| Subject: Re: 2011 NCAA College Football Discussion thread Sun Jan 01, 2012 4:38 pm | |
| - AuzGrams wrote:
- bakes991 wrote:
- Good win Utah! Close game, which is what I expected and it was exciting to follow, even though GT lost, it was a well fought game by both sides.
8-5 was a better season that I was expecting! Let's be honest, GT needs to get rid of Paul Johnson, they seem like they have a solid program, but that option offense isn't fooling the top of the ACC like VT. Don't see them getting rid of him, or even if they did, I don't see them changing too much. | |
|
| |
AuzGrams Moderator
Number of posts : 1514 Age : 30 Location : Heber City, UT Registration date : 2010-05-15
| Subject: Re: 2011 NCAA College Football Discussion thread Sun Jan 01, 2012 4:45 pm | |
| - bakes991 wrote:
- AuzGrams wrote:
- bakes991 wrote:
- Good win Utah! Close game, which is what I expected and it was exciting to follow, even though GT lost, it was a well fought game by both sides.
8-5 was a better season that I was expecting! Let's be honest, GT needs to get rid of Paul Johnson, they seem like they have a solid program, but that option offense isn't fooling the top of the ACC like VT. Don't see them getting rid of him, or even if they did, I don't see them changing too much. Option offense is redundant for a non-military school where they can actually recruit talent (NFL talent), military schools run the option because they are at a recruiting disadvantage because those guys will be in the military after being in the academy. There's a reason that no one else runs it. It doesn't work. | |
|
| |
TheShermanator Admin
Number of posts : 2398 Age : 31 Registration date : 2008-12-12
| Subject: Re: 2011 NCAA College Football Discussion thread Tue Jan 03, 2012 3:58 am | |
| Time for '07 championship game rematch! | |
|
| |
Doc Nationwide Driver
Number of posts : 795 Age : 29 Location : Georgia Registration date : 2009-09-02
| Subject: Re: 2011 NCAA College Football Discussion thread Tue Jan 03, 2012 8:56 am | |
| - AuzGrams wrote:
- bakes991 wrote:
- AuzGrams wrote:
- bakes991 wrote:
- Good win Utah! Close game, which is what I expected and it was exciting to follow, even though GT lost, it was a well fought game by both sides.
8-5 was a better season that I was expecting! Let's be honest, GT needs to get rid of Paul Johnson, they seem like they have a solid program, but that option offense isn't fooling the top of the ACC like VT. Don't see them getting rid of him, or even if they did, I don't see them changing too much. Option offense is redundant for a non-military school where they can actually recruit talent (NFL talent), military schools run the option because they are at a recruiting disadvantage because those guys will be in the military after being in the academy.
There's a reason that no one else runs it. It doesn't work. It's not a recruiting disadvantage, it's the size disadvantage. | |
|
| |
AuzGrams Moderator
Number of posts : 1514 Age : 30 Location : Heber City, UT Registration date : 2010-05-15
| Subject: Re: 2011 NCAA College Football Discussion thread Tue Jan 03, 2012 9:01 am | |
| - Stephen Black wrote:
- AuzGrams wrote:
- bakes991 wrote:
- AuzGrams wrote:
- bakes991 wrote:
- Good win Utah! Close game, which is what I expected and it was exciting to follow, even though GT lost, it was a well fought game by both sides.
8-5 was a better season that I was expecting! Let's be honest, GT needs to get rid of Paul Johnson, they seem like they have a solid program, but that option offense isn't fooling the top of the ACC like VT. Don't see them getting rid of him, or even if they did, I don't see them changing too much. Option offense is redundant for a non-military school where they can actually recruit talent (NFL talent), military schools run the option because they are at a recruiting disadvantage because those guys will be in the military after being in the academy.
There's a reason that no one else runs it. It doesn't work. It's not a recruiting disadvantage, it's the size disadvantage. Yes it's a recruiting disadvantage, do you think many players with NFL talent/potential would want to go to a military school? I wouldn't if I was in that position to where it was to the point where I thought I had the shot at the NFL. | |
|
| |
Matt Patterson USAR Late Model Racer
Number of posts : 305 Age : 28 Location : Fredericksburg,VA Registration date : 2009-12-05
| Subject: Re: 2011 NCAA College Football Discussion thread Tue Jan 03, 2012 12:54 pm | |
| ANDREW LUCK SCOUTING :ohboyherewego: | |
|
| |
Lambert Moderator
Number of posts : 1139 Age : 36 Registration date : 2009-12-07
| Subject: Re: 2011 NCAA College Football Discussion thread Tue Jan 03, 2012 1:00 pm | |
| My view on the Rose Bowl... (Taken from my Facebook)
Total bull crap officiating in the Rose Bowl. There has been holding out the butt on Oregon and just dirty playing. You thought LSU was dirty, they ain't got nothing on Oregon. #DUCKSSUCK | |
|
| |
Buckeye24 USAR Late Model Racer
Number of posts : 228 Age : 30 Location : Ohio Registration date : 2009-12-06
| Subject: Re: 2011 NCAA College Football Discussion thread Tue Jan 03, 2012 3:49 pm | |
| Player of the day - Case Keenum - 532 yards and 3 td's. The dude had 380 yards at half. Penn State's D didn't have a chance.
Fail(s) of the day 1. Ohio State's O-line, allowed 6 sacks and kept Braxton Miller under pressure all day. 2. Rob Bolden - 7 for 26 for 137 yards and only 1 touchdown, while throwing three picks. 3. Last, but not least, Jordan Williamson, Stanford's kicker. Seriously, dude, I know you're under pressure and all, but you just lost the game for your team twice. Better luck next time.
Just my take on the day.
Last edited by Buckeye24 on Tue Jan 03, 2012 4:02 pm; edited 1 time in total | |
|
| |
Jordan Robson Solstice Legend
Number of posts : 1838 Age : 32 Registration date : 2009-09-01
| Subject: Re: 2011 NCAA College Football Discussion thread Tue Jan 03, 2012 3:59 pm | |
| - Lambert wrote:
- My view on the Rose Bowl... (Taken from my Facebook)
Total bull crap officiating in the Rose Bowl. There has been holding out the butt on Oregon and just dirty playing. You thought LSU was dirty, they ain't got nothing on Oregon. #DUCKSSUCK Uh dude weren't you a Oregon fan or some shit last year?? lolol. And weren't you a Saints fan 2-3 years ago? And now your Packers? #BANDWAGON | |
|
| |
Lambert Moderator
Number of posts : 1139 Age : 36 Registration date : 2009-12-07
| Subject: Re: 2011 NCAA College Football Discussion thread Tue Jan 03, 2012 10:38 pm | |
| Um... no. I've never liked Oregon, I've pretty much hated them in the past couple of years. I've been an Auburn fan since I was like 16.
As for the Saints, they're my second favorite team in the NFL, so I like to see them do good. And I like them b/c they have the same mascot as my high school. But, I've been a Packers fan since I was a little kid. Took after my dad and his family on that one, b/c my dad was from Wisconsin.
#GetFactsStraight | |
|
| |
Doc Nationwide Driver
Number of posts : 795 Age : 29 Location : Georgia Registration date : 2009-09-02
| Subject: Re: 2011 NCAA College Football Discussion thread Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:01 am | |
| I didn't know this was Twitter.. lol | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: 2011 NCAA College Football Discussion thread Wed Jan 04, 2012 2:40 am | |
| |
|
| |
TheShermanator Admin
Number of posts : 2398 Age : 31 Registration date : 2008-12-12
| Subject: Re: 2011 NCAA College Football Discussion thread Wed Jan 04, 2012 3:02 am | |
| #hashtagsareretarded
#thisisnottwitter | |
|
| |
Jake_Ace Solstice Legend
Number of posts : 2800 Age : 29 Location : Rumford, Maine Registration date : 2009-09-25
| Subject: Re: 2011 NCAA College Football Discussion thread Wed Jan 04, 2012 3:59 am | |
| | |
|
| |
Chin Server Manager
Number of posts : 678 Age : 30 Registration date : 2011-11-06
| Subject: Re: 2011 NCAA College Football Discussion thread Wed Jan 04, 2012 5:29 am | |
| | |
|
| |
Jordan Robson Solstice Legend
Number of posts : 1838 Age : 32 Registration date : 2009-09-01
| Subject: Re: 2011 NCAA College Football Discussion thread Wed Jan 04, 2012 6:29 am | |
| #peoplemad
#stephenblacklikesllamaslolol. | |
|
| |
Buckeye24 USAR Late Model Racer
Number of posts : 228 Age : 30 Location : Ohio Registration date : 2009-12-06
| Subject: Re: 2011 NCAA College Football Discussion thread Wed Jan 04, 2012 10:31 am | |
| | |
|
| |
AuzGrams Moderator
Number of posts : 1514 Age : 30 Location : Heber City, UT Registration date : 2010-05-15
| Subject: Re: 2011 NCAA College Football Discussion thread Wed Jan 04, 2012 11:05 am | |
| I would watch that game, except for the fact it's an absolute joke that Boise State and Kansas State got snubbed for two teams that are "popular" apparently, not that people wouldn't rather watch Boise State over Virginia Tech. | |
|
| |
Matt Patterson USAR Late Model Racer
Number of posts : 305 Age : 28 Location : Fredericksburg,VA Registration date : 2009-12-05
| Subject: Re: 2011 NCAA College Football Discussion thread Wed Jan 04, 2012 11:19 am | |
| Because it's actually going to be a good matchup and the bowl games select the teams based on who they think people want to see, it's not their fault if someone is butthurt because their favorite team wasn't picked | |
|
| |
Jordan Robson Solstice Legend
Number of posts : 1838 Age : 32 Registration date : 2009-09-01
| Subject: Re: 2011 NCAA College Football Discussion thread Wed Jan 04, 2012 11:22 am | |
| Because it might be a "good" matchup doesn't mean its the right one. They are suppose to be pick the most 'deserving' teams to be in these bowls. They got it wrong with this one and the National Title game. Bama shouldn't be there. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: 2011 NCAA College Football Discussion thread | |
| |
|
| |
| 2011 NCAA College Football Discussion thread | |
|