2011 NCAA College Football Discussion thread

FUCK THE BIG 10 FUCKIN FUCK

so i came up with a pretty interesting way they should run the BCS National Championship:

The top overall ranked conference of all teams (like the Big 12 has 6 teams in the top 25) which would make give the championship berth to the Big 12 Champ and the opponent would be the SEC Champion (the SEC has 5 teams in the top 25)

i really didnt have a time to do math but here are the conferences as it goes

Big 12: 6 teams in top 25
SEC: 5 teams in top 25(holds top 2 spots)
Big 10: 5 teams in top 25
Pac-12: 2 teams in top 25
C-USA: 2 teams in top 25
Mountain West: 2 teams in top 25
ACC: 2 teams in top 25
Big East: 1 team in top 25

PAC-12 has 3 ranked teams. Rankings are biased and completely irrelevant for the most part anyways, Craig James (who needs to get the fuck out from ESPN and leave for the sake of all college fans) said on national TV that he ranked Boise State 24th, and whether you like them or not, that just shows how much bias and how much knowledge some people have about these teams.

Need a playoff. That'll solve everything. But NCAA is like NASCAR and dumb.

I can see it now: December Delirium

lol

How about they take the champions of the Big 10, Big 12, Pac-10, SEC, Big East, and ACC and two at-large bids and make an 8-team playoff?

Nah. That would be too simple.

They just need to reformat the whole country into 4-6 super-conferences. Better competition if you ask me

Jordan Robson wrote:

Need a playoff. That'll solve everything. But NCAA is like NASCAR and dumb.

If you play 11 or 12 games and have a playoff you would be playing football well into the next year and that really takes away the definition of a student-athlete tbh.

Start an 8-team playoff in late December and it ends in early January. It really doesn't take that long.

Stephen Black wrote:

Jordan Robson wrote:

Need a playoff. That'll solve everything. But NCAA is like NASCAR and dumb.

If you play 11 or 12 games and have a playoff you would be playing football well into the next year and that really takes away the definition of a student-athlete tbh.

we have a 9 game regular season then a 16 team- 4 game playoff in HIGH SCHOOL

Buckeye24 wrote:

Start an 8-team playoff in late December and it ends in early January. It really doesn't take that long.

Perfect to fill the month gap between the season and bowl games

I like Buckeye's idea.

Stephen Black wrote:

Jordan Robson wrote:

Need a playoff. That'll solve everything. But NCAA is like NASCAR and dumb.

If you play 11 or 12 games and have a playoff you would be playing football well into the next year and that really takes away the definition of a student-athlete tbh.

Oh, please, not like these teams and a lot of these athletes aren't loaded with money to go to these bowl sites. The National Championship is on January 9th usually, so I'm not buying that.

i like the idea of playoffs, but if they did them, i would still want to see bowl games

volsdude14 wrote:

i like the idea of playoffs, but if they did them, i would still want to see bowl games

8 team playoff is simple, make the first round games into the actual BCS bowls. Rotate the semi-finals and finals sites.

They could have a playoff and still have bowl games. The idea here is to find a better way to determine a champion other than polls and computers.

watching Virginia Tech get buttfucked last night was eyeracingamazing

Patterson's mad... lol

volsdude14 wrote:

watching Virginia Tech get buttfucked last night was eyeracingamazing

...and somehow Virginia Tech is now apparently going to get into the Sugar Bowl (after all reports said they were in the Peach Bowl). Absolutely pathetic. Virginia Tech's shitbox schedule (only impressive win is Georgia Tech) makes Boise State's look impressive.

I'm not a Michigan fan by any means, but I hope VT gets slaughtered by 70.

i dont think we should be in the sugar bowl after last night. the guys went in thinking we were gonna dominate and we didn't.




...and the SEC can suck my dick.

Matt Patterson wrote:

i dont think we should be in the sugar bowl after last night. the guys went in thinking we were gonna dominate and we didn't.




...and the SEC can suck my dick.

The SEC is the sole reason your team is in the Sugar Bowl.

i dont want them to be in the Sugar Bowl, i would rather see them rape Auburn in the Chick-Fil-A bowl and get ready for next year

Matt Patterson wrote:

i dont want them to be in the Sugar Bowl, i would rather see them rape Auburn in the Chick-Fil-A bowl and get ready for next year

So would everyone else, I'd rather enjoy a good game between Michigan (should be Kansas State, but whatever) vs. Boise State.

Boise State would get murdered. I think Michigan will win, but VT is going to put up a good fight after this big of a loss.

Matt Patterson wrote:

i dont think we should be in the sugar bowl after last night. the guys went in thinking we were gonna dominate and we didn't.




...and the SEC can suck my dick.

umad?